| NODIS Library | Program Management(8000s) | Search |

NASA Ball NASA
Procedural
Requirements
NPR 8705.4B
Effective Date: November 01, 2024
Expiration Date: November 01, 2029
COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY FOR NASA EMPLOYEES
Printable Format (PDF)

Subject: Risk Classification for NASA Payloads

Responsible Office: Office of Safety and Mission Assurance


| TOC | Preface | Chapter1 | Chapter2 | Chapter3 | AppendixA | AppendixB | AppendixC | AppendixD | AppendixE | AppendixF | ALL |

Appendix A. Definitions

Acceptable risk. A level of risk, referring to a specific item, system or activity, that, when evaluated with consideration of its associated uncertainty, satisfies pre-established risk criteria.

Approving authority. The person or organization responsible for oversight of the requirement and authorized to grant relief from the requirement. [source NPR 8715.1, NASA Safety and Health Programs]

Assurance Implementation Matrix. A documented planned implementation consistent with the mission or instrument risk classification(s) and SMA objectives in Class A to Class D.

Breadboard. A low-fidelity unit that demonstrates function only, without respect to form or fit. It often uses commercial and/or ad hoc components and is not intended to provide definitive information regarding operational performance.

Concurrence. A documented agreement by a management official that a proposed course of action is acceptable.

Critical item. A critical item is one which, if defective or fails, causes a catastrophic event affecting the public, NASA workforce, high-value assets, or mission success. Reliability considerations apply to determination of criticality for cases where loss of multiple units of the item in question is required for the catastrophic event to be realized, and the units are of the same design and build lot and have a common failure mode relevant to the critical function (e.g., fasteners, capacitors).

Critical process. A critical process is an activity performed by NASA, suppliers, or NASA services suppliers during mission development, launch preparations, launch, commissioning, operations, and decommissioning that if defective or fails to achieve the intended results directly contributes to or causes a catastrophic event affecting the public, NASA workforce, high-value assets, or mission success.

Decision memorandum. The document that summarizes the decisions made at KDPs or, as necessary, in between KDPs. The decision memorandum includes the Agency Baseline Commitment (if applicable), Management Agreement cost and schedule, unallocated future expenses, and schedule margin managed above the project, as well as life-cycle cost and schedule estimates, as required.

Deviation. A documented authorization releasing a program or project from meeting a requirement before the requirement is put under configuration control at the level the requirement will be implemented.

Engineering unit. A high fidelity unit that demonstrates critical aspects of the engineering processes involved in the development of the operational unit. Engineering test units are intended to closely resemble the final product (hardware/software) to the maximum extent possible and are built and tested so as to establish confidence that the design will function in the expected environments. In some cases, the engineering unit can become the final product, assuming proper traceability has been exercised over the components and hardware handling.

Fault. An undesired system state and/or the immediate cause of failure (e.g., maladjustment, misalignment, defect, or other). The definition of the term “fault” envelopes the word “failure,” since faults include other undesired events such as software anomalies and operational anomalies.

Fault tolerance. The built-in ability of a system to provide continued correct operation in the presence of a specified number of faults or failures.

Flight Acceptance. Flight hardware or software that is tested to the levels that demonstrate the desired qualification level margins. Sometimes this means testing to failure. This unit is never used operationally.

Flight unit. The actual end item that is intended for deployment and operations. It is subjected to formal functional and acceptance testing.

Flight spare. The spare end item for flight. It is subjected to formal acceptance testing. It is identical to the flight unit.

Graceful degradation. Ability of a systems or component to work to maintain limited functionality even when a large portion of it has been destroyed or rendered inoperative. The purpose of graceful degradation is to prevent catastrophic failure.

Launch constraint. Bounding conditions limiting or restricting aspects of launch related operations.

Life-cycle cost. The total of the direct, indirect, recurring, nonrecurring, and other related expenses both incurred and estimated to be incurred in the design, development, verification, production, deployment, prime mission operation, maintenance, support, and disposal of a project, including closeout, but not extended operations. The Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) of a project or system can also be defined as the total cost of ownership over the project or system’s planned life cycle from Formulation (excluding Pre-Phase A) through Implementation (excluding extended operations). The LCC includes the cost of the launch vehicle.

Mission. A major activity required to accomplish an Agency goal or to effectively pursue a scientific, technological, or engineering opportunity directly related to an Agency goal. Mission needs are independent of any particular system or technological solution.

Protoflight. Cases when a qualification unit is not developed (due to cost or schedule constraints). The protoflight unit is intended for flight or deployment and operations. A limited set of qualification and tests are performed on the prototype to preserve its ability to function and life expectancy. Full acceptance testing is performed.

Project plan. The document that establishes the project's baseline for Implementation, signed by the responsible program manager, Center Director, project manager, and the MDAA, if required.

Proof of concept. Analytical and experimental demonstration of hardware/software concepts that may or may not be incorporated into subsequent development and/or operational units.

Risk. The potential for shortfalls with respect to achieving explicitly established and stated objectives. As applied to programs and projects, these objectives are translated into performance requirements, which may be related to mission execution domains (safety, mission success, cost, and schedule) or institutional support for mission execution. Risk is operationally characterized as a set of triplets:

The scenario(s) leading to degraded performance with respect to one or more performance measures (e.g., scenarios leading to injury, fatality, destruction of key assets; scenarios leading to exceedance of mass limits; scenarios leading to cost overruns; scenarios leading to schedule slippage).

The likelihood(s) (qualitative or quantitative) of those scenarios.

The consequence(s) (qualitative or quantitative severity of the performance degradation) that would result if those scenarios were to occur.

Uncertainties are included in the evaluation of likelihoods and identification of scenarios.

Risk appetite. Amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to pursue or retain.

Risk classification. A stakeholder’s declaration of tolerance for risk based on factors such as priority, national significance, technological challenge, and resources available, used to recommend a set of activities and level of scrutiny for maintaining the level of risk.

Risk tolerance. The acceptable level of variance in performance relative to the achievement of objectives. It is generally established at the program, objective, or component level. In setting risk tolerance levels, management considers the relative importance of the related objectives and aligns risk tolerance with risk appetite.

Single point failure. An independent element of a system (hardware, software, or human), the failure of which would result in loss of mission objectives, hardware, or crew as defined for the specific application or project.

Submitting Authority. The person or organization seeking relief from a requirement. [source NPR 8715.1]

Tailoring. The process used to adjust or seek relief from a prescribed requirement to accommodate the needs of a specific task or activity (e.g., program or project).

Waiver. A written authorization to depart from a specific directive requirement.



| TOC | Preface | Chapter1 | Chapter2 | Chapter3 | AppendixA | AppendixB | AppendixC | AppendixD | AppendixE | AppendixF | ALL |
 
| NODIS Library | Program Management(8000s) | Search |

DISTRIBUTION:
NODIS


This document does not bind the public, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract. This document is uncontrolled when printed. Check the NASA Online Directives Information System (NODIS) Library to verify that this is the correct version before use: https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov.