| EXECUTIVE ORDER |
EO 13387 Effective Date: October 18, 2005 |
| Responsible Office: Office of the Administrator |
| Subject: 2005 Amendments tot he Manual for Courts-Martial, United States |
2005 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial,
United States
By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United
States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10
U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments
to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States,
prescribed by Executive Order 12473, as amended, it is
hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Part II of the Manual for Courts-
Martial, United States, is amended as follows:
(a) R.C.M. 103(2) is amended by replacing the word
``without'' with the word ``with'' and by replacing the
word ``noncapital'' with the word ``capital''.
(b) R.C.M. 201(e)(2)(B) is amended by adding the
word ``general'' between the words ``convene'' and
``courts-martial'' and by inserting the following words
after ``armed forces'':
``assigned or attached to a combatant command or
joint command''.
(c) R.C.M. 201(e)(2)(C) is amended by inserting the
words ``assigned or attached to a joint command or
joint task force,'' immediately before the words
``under regulations which the superior command may
prescribe''.
(d) R.C.M. 201(e)(3) is amended by inserting the
following immediately after the words ``armed force'':
``, using the implementing regulations and
procedures prescribed by the Secretary concerned of the
military service of the accused,''.
(e) R.C.M. 201(e)(4) is amended by adding the words
``, member, or counsel'' after the words ``military
judge''.
(f) R.C.M. 201(f)(1)(A)(iii)(b) is amended to read
as follows:
``(b) The case has not been referred with a special
instruction that the case is to be tried as capital.''
(g) R.C.M. 307(c)(4) is amended by inserting the
following at the end thereof:
``What is substantially one transaction should not
be made the basis for an unreasonable multiplication of
charges against one person.''
(h) R.C.M. 501(a)(1) is amended to read as follows:
``(1) General courts-martial.
(A) Except in capital cases, general courts-martial
shall consist of a military judge and not less than
five members, or of the military judge alone if
requested and approved under R.C.M. 903.
(B) In all capital cases, general courts-martial
shall consist of a military judge and no fewer than 12
members, unless 12 members are not reasonably available
because of physical conditions or military exigencies.
If 12 members are not reasonably available, the
convening authority shall detail the next lesser number
of reasonably available members under 12, but in no
event fewer than five. In such a case, the convening
authority shall state in the convening order the
reasons why 12 members are not reasonably available.''
[[Page 60698]]
(i) R.C.M. 503(a)(3) is amended by deleting
``court-martial'' and inserting ``courts-martial'' in
lieu thereof.
(j) R.C.M. 503(b)(3) is amended by inserting the
words ``, a combatant command or joint command'' after
the words ``A military judge from one armed force may
be detailed to a court-martial convened in a different
armed force''.
(k) R.C.M. 503(c)(3) is amended by inserting the
words ``, a combatant command or joint command'' after
the words ``A person from one armed force may be
detailed to serve as counsel in a court-martial in a
different armed force''.
(l) R.C.M. 504, (b)(2)(A) is amended by inserting
the following at the end thereof:
``A subordinate joint command or joint task force
is ordinarily considered to be ``separate or
detached.''''
(m) R.C.M. 504, (b)(2)(B) is amended by deleting
the word ``or'' at the end of the first element
thereof, by deleting the period and adding `` ; or'' at
the end of the second element thereof, and by inserting
the following as a third element:
``(iii) In a combatant command or joint command, by
the officer exercising general court-martial
jurisdiction over the command.''
(n) R.C.M. 805(b) is amended by replacing the
current second sentence with the following:
``No general court-martial proceeding requiring the
presence of members may be conducted unless at least
five members are present, or in capital cases, at least
12 members are present except as provided in R.C.M.
501(a)(1)(B), where 12 members are not reasonably
available because of physical conditions or military
exigencies. No special court-martial proceeding
requiring the presence of members may be conducted
unless at least three members are present except as
provided in R.C.M. 912(h).''
(o) R.C.M. 912(f)(4) is amended by deleting the
fifth sentence and by inserting the following words
immediately after the words ``When a challenge for
cause has been denied'' in the fourth sentence:
``the successful use of a peremptory challenge by
either party, excusing the challenged member from
further participation in the court-martial, shall
preclude further consideration of the challenge of that
excused member upon later review. Further,''
(p) R.C.M. 1003(b)(2) is amended by replacing the
word ``foreign'' with the word ``hardship.''
(q) R.C.M. 1004(b) is amended by inserting the
following after ``(1) Notice.'' and before the word
``Before'':
``(A) Referral. The convening authority shall
indicate that the case is to be tried as a capital case
by including a special instruction in the referral
block of the charge sheet. Failure to include this
special instruction at the time of the referral shall
not bar the convening authority from later adding the
required special instruction, provided:
(i) that the convening authority has otherwise
complied with the notice requirement of subsection (B);
and
(ii) that if the accused demonstrates specific
prejudice from such failure to include the special
instruction, a continuance or a recess is an adequate
remedy.
(B) Arraignment.''
(r) Insert the following new R.C.M. 1103A after
R.C.M. 1103:
``Rule 1103A. Sealed exhibits and proceedings.
(a) In general. If the record of trial contains
exhibits, proceedings, or other matter ordered sealed
by the military judge, the trial counsel shall
[[Page 60699]]
cause such materials to be sealed so as to prevent
indiscriminate viewing or disclosure. Trial counsel
shall ensure that such materials are properly marked,
including an annotation that the material was sealed by
order of the military judge, and inserted at the
appropriate place in the original record of trial.
Copies of the record shall contain appropriate
annotations that matters were sealed by order of the
military judge and have been inserted in the original
record of trial. This Rule shall be implemented in a
manner consistent with Executive Order 12958, as
amended, concerning classified national security
information.
(b) Examination of sealed exhibits and proceedings.
Except as provided in the following subsections to this
rule, sealed exhibits may not be examined.
(1) Examination of sealed matters. For the purpose
of this rule, ``examination'' includes reading,
viewing, photocopying, photographing, disclosing, or
manipulating the documents in any way.
(2) Prior to authentication. Prior to
authentication of the record by the military judge,
sealed materials may not be examined in the absence of
an order from the military judge based on good cause
shown.
(3) Authentication through action. After
authentication and prior to disposition of the record
of trial pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial 1111,
sealed materials may not be examined in the absence of
an order from the military judge upon a showing of good
cause at a post-trial Article 39a session directed by
the Convening Authority.
(4) Reviewing and appellate authorities.
(A) Reviewing and appellate authorities may examine
sealed matters when those authorities determine that
such action is reasonably necessary to a proper
fulfillment of their responsibilities under the Uniform
Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-
Martial, governing directives, instructions,
regulations, applicable rules for practice and
procedure, or rules of professional responsibility.
(B) Reviewing and appellate authorities shall not,
however, disclose sealed matter or information in the
absence of:
(i) Prior authorization of the Judge Advocate
General in the case of review under Rule for Courts-
Martial 1201(b); or
(ii) Prior authorization of the appellate court
before which a case is pending review under Rules for
Courts-Martial 1203 and 1204.
(C) In those cases in which review is sought or
pending before the United States Supreme Court,
authorization to disclose sealed materials or
information shall be obtained under that Court's rules
of practice and procedure.
(D) The authorizing officials in paragraph (B)(ii)
above may place conditions on authorized disclosures in
order to minimize the disclosure.
(E) For purposes of this rule, reviewing and
appellate authorities are limited to:
(i) Judge advocates reviewing records pursuant to
Rule for Courts-Martial 1112;
(ii) Officers and attorneys in the office of the
Judge Advocate General reviewing records pursuant to
Rule for Courts-Martial 1201(b);
(iii) Appellate government counsel;
(iv) Appellate defense counsel;
(v) Appellate judges of the Courts of Criminal
Appeals and their professional staffs;
(vi) The judges of the United States Court of
Appeals for the Armed Forces and their professional
staffs;
(vii) The Justices of the United States Supreme
Court and their professional staffs; and
[[Page 60700]]
(viii) Any other court of competent jurisdiction.''
(s) R.C.M. 1301(a) is amended by inserting the
following after the second sentence:
``Summary courts-martial shall be conducted in
accordance with the regulations of the military service
to which the accused belongs.''
Sec. 2. Part III of the Manual for Courts-Martial,
United States, is amended as follows:
Mil. R. Evid. 317(b) is amended by replacing the
word ``Transportation'' with the words ``Homeland
Security.''
Sec. 3. Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial,
United States, is amended as follows:
(a) Paragraph 14c(2)(a) is amended by inserting the
following new subparagraph (ii) and renumbering
existing subparagraphs (a)(ii) through (iv) as (a)(iii)
through (v):
``(ii) Determination of lawfulness. The lawfulness
of an order is a question of law to be determined by
the military judge.''
(b) Paragraph 16(c)(1)(a) is amended by replacing
the word ``Transportation'' with the words ``Homeland
Security''.
(c) Paragraph 35a is amended to read as follows:
``a. Text.
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who--
(1) operates or physically controls any vehicle,
aircraft, or vessel in a reckless or wanton manner or
while impaired by a substance described in section
912a(b) of this title (Article 112a(b)), or
(2) operates or is in actual physical control of
any vehicle, aircraft, or vessel while drunk or when
the alcohol concentration in the person's blood or
breath is equal to or exceeds the level prohibited
under subsection (b), as shown by chemical analysis,
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
(b)(1) For purposes of subsection (a), the
applicable level of the alcohol concentration in a
person's blood or breath is as follows:
(A) In the case of the operation or control of a
vehicle, aircraft, or vessel in the United States, the
level is the blood alcohol concentration prohibited
under the law of the State in which the conduct
occurred, except as may be provided under paragraph
(b)(2) for conduct on a military installation that is
in more than one State, or the prohibited alcohol
concentration level specified in paragraph (b)(3).
(B) In the case of the operation or control of a
vehicle, aircraft, or vessel outside the United States,
the level is the blood alcohol concentration specified
in paragraph (b)(3) or such lower level as the
Secretary of Defense may by regulation prescribe.
(2) In the case of a military installation that is
in more than one State, if those States have different
levels for defining their prohibited blood alcohol
concentrations under their respective State laws, the
Secretary concerned for the installation may select one
such level to apply uniformly on that installation.
(3) For purposes of paragraph (b)(1), the level of
alcohol concentration prohibited in a person's blood is
0.10 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of
blood and with respect to alcohol concentration in a
person's breath is 0.10 grams or more of alcohol per
210 liters of breath, as shown by chemical analysis.''
(4) In this subsection, the term ``United States''
includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American
Samoa, and the term ``State'' includes each of those
jurisdictions.''
[[Page 60701]]
(d) Paragraph 35b(2)(c) is amended to read as
follows:
``(c) the alcohol concentration level in the
accused's blood or breath, as shown by chemical
analysis, was equal to or exceeded the applicable level
provided in paragraph 35a above.''
(e) Paragraph 35f is amended as follows:
``In that -------- ----(personal jurisdiction
data), did (at/on board--required), on or about 20----
--, (in the motor pool area) (near the Officer's Club)
(at the intersection of ---- -- and ------) (while in
the Gulf of Mexico) (while in flight over North
America) physically control [a vehicle, to wit: (a
truck) (a passenger car) (------)] [an aircraft, to
wit: (an AH-64 helicopter)(an F-14A fighter)(a KC-135
tanker) (---- --)] [a vessel, to wit: (the aircraft
carrier USS ------) (the Coast Guard Cutter) (-- ----
)], [while drunk] [while impaired by ------] [while the
alcohol concentration in his (blood)(breath) was, as
shown by chemical analysis, equal to or exceeded (.10)
(---- --) grams of alcohol per (100 milliliters of
blood) (210 liters of breath), which is the limit under
(cite applicable State law) (cite applicable statute or
regulation)] [in a (reckless) (wanton) manner by
(attempting to pass another vehicle on a sharp curve)
(by ordering that the aircraft be flown below the
authorized altitude)] [and did thereby cause said
(vehicle) (aircraft) (vessel) to (strike and) (injure
------ ------ )].''
(f) Paragraph 97 is amended by (1) inserting the
following new subparagraph (b)(2) and renumbering the
existing subparagraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) as (b)(3) and
(b)(4); (2) adding the words ``and patronizing a
prostitute'' after the word ``Prostitution'' in
subparagraph (e)(1); and (3) inserting the following
new subparagraph (f)(2) and renumbering the existing
subparagraphs (f)(2) and (f)(3) as (f)(3) and (f)(4):
``(b)(2) Patronizing a prostitute.
(a) That the accused had sexual intercourse with
another person not the accused's spouse;
(b) That the accused compelled, induced, enticed,
or procured such person to engage in an act of sexual
intercourse in exchange for money or other
compensation; and
(c) That this act was wrongful; and
(d) That, under the circumstances, the conduct of
the accused was to the prejudice of good order and
discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to
bring discredit upon the armed forces.''
``(f)(2) Patronizing a prostitute.
In that ---- -- (personal jurisdiction data), did,
(at/on board--location) (subject-matter jurisdiction
data, if required), on or about ------ 20------,
wrongfully (compel) (induce) (entice) (procure) ---- --
, a person not his/her spouse, to engage in (an act)
(acts) of sexual intercourse with the accused in
exchange for (money) (------ ------).''
(g) Paragraph 109 is amended to read as follows:
``109. ARTICLE 134--(Threat or hoax designed or
intended to cause panic or public fear)
a. Text. See paragraph 60.
b. Elements.
(1) Threat.
(a) That the accused communicated certain language;
(b) That the information communicated amounted to a
threat;
(c) That the harm threatened was to be done by
means of an explosive; weapon of mass destruction;
biological or chemical agent, substance, or weapon; or
hazardous material;
(d) That the communication was wrongful; and
[[Page 60702]]
(e) That, under the circumstances, the conduct of
the accused was to the prejudice of good order and
discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to
bring discredit upon the armed forces.
(2) Hoax.
(a) That the accused communicated or conveyed
certain information;
(b) That the information communicated or conveyed
concerned an attempt being made or to be made by means
of an explosive; weapon of mass destruction; biological
or chemical agent, substance, or weapon; or hazardous
material, to unlawfully kill, injure, or intimidate a
person or to unlawfully damage or destroy certain
property;
(c) That the information communicated or conveyed
by the accused was false and that the accused then knew
it to be false;
(d) That the communication of the information by
the accused was malicious; and
(e) That, under the circumstances, the conduct of
the accused was to the prejudice of good order and
discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to
bring discredit upon the armed forces.
c. Explanation.
(1) Threat. A ``threat'' means an expressed present
determination or intent to kill, injure, or intimidate
a person or to damage or destroy certain property
presently or in the future. Proof that the accused
actually intended to kill, injure, intimidate, damage,
or destroy is not required.
(2) Explosive. ``Explosive'' means gunpowder,
powders used for blasting, all forms of high
explosives, blasting materials, fuses (other than
electrical circuit breakers), detonators, and other
detonating agents, smokeless powders, any explosive
bomb, grenade, missile, or similar device, and any
incendiary bomb or grenade, fire bomb, or similar
device, and any other explosive compound, mixture, or
similar material.
(3) Weapon of mass destruction. A weapon of mass
destruction means any device, explosive or otherwise,
that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death
or serious bodily injury to a significant number of
people through the release, dissemination, or impact
of: toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors;
a disease organism; or radiation or radioactivity.
(4) Biological agent. The term ``biological agent''
means 12 any micro-organism (including bacteria,
viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or
infectious substance, and any naturally occurring,
bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such
micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
whatever its origin or method of production, that is
capable of causing--
(a) death, disease, or other biological malfunction
in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living
organism;
(b) deterioration of food, water, equipment,
supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(c) deleterious alteration of the environment.
(5) Chemical agent, substance, or weapon. A
chemical agent, substance, or weapon refers to a toxic
chemical and its precursors or a munition or device,
specifically designed to cause death or other harm
through toxic properties of those chemicals that would
be released as a result of the employment of such
munition or device, and any equipment specifically
designed for use directly in connection with the
employment of such munitions or devices.
(6) Hazardous material. A substance or material
(including explosive, radioactive material, etiologic
agent, flammable or combustible liquid or solid,
poison, oxidizing or corrosive material, and compressed
gas, or mixture thereof) or a group or class of
material designated as hazardous by the Secretary of
Transportation.
[[Page 60703]]
(7) Malicious. A communication is ``malicious'' if
the accused believed that the information would
probably interfere with the peaceful use of the
building, vehicle, aircraft, or other property
concerned, or would cause fear or concern to one or
more persons.
d. Lesser included offenses.
(1) Threat
(a) Article 134--communicating a threat
(b) Article 80--attempts
(c) Article 128--assault
(2) Hoax. Article 80--attempts
e. Maximum punishment. Dishonorable discharge,
forfeitures of all pay and allowances, and confinement
for 10 years.
f. Sample specifications.
(1) Threat.
In that ------ ------ (personal jurisdiction data)
did, (at/on board--location) on or about ---- ------
20-- ----, wrongfully communicate certain information,
to wit: ------ ------, which language constituted a
threat to harm a person or property by means of a(n)
[explosive; weapon of mass destruction; biological
agent, substance, or weapon; chemical agent, substance,
or weapon; and/or (a) hazardous material(s)].
(2) Hoax.
In that ------ ------ (personal jurisdiction data)
did, (at/on board--location), on or about ---- --------
20-- ------, maliciously (communicate) (convey) certain
information concerning an attempt being made or to be
made to unlawfully [(kill) (injure) (intimidate) ------
------] [(damage) (destroy) ------ ------] by means of
a(n) [explosive; weapon of mass destruction; biological
agent, substance, or weapon; chemical agent, substance,
or weapon; and/or (a) hazardous material(s)], to wit:
------, which information was false and which the
accused then knew to be false.''
Sec. 4. Part V of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United
States, is amended as follows:
(a) Paragraph 1(h) is amended by redesignating
existing paragraph 1(h) as 1(i) and inserting the
following new paragraph 1(h):
``h. Applicable standards. Unless otherwise
provided, the service regulations and procedures of the
servicemember shall apply.''
(b) Paragraph 2(a) is amended by replacing the
words ``Unless otherwise'' with the word ``As''.
(c) Paragraph 2(a) is amended by inserting the
following after the second sentence:
``Commander includes a commander of a joint
command.''
(d) Paragraph 2(a) is amended by inserting the
words ``of a commander'' in the third sentence after
the words ``the authority.''
Sec. 5. These amendments shall take effect 30 days from
the date of this order.
(a) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed
to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the
effective date of this order that was not punishable
when done or omitted.
(b) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed
to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding,
restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in
which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior
to the effective date of this order, and any such
nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint,
investigation, referral of charges, trial, or other
action
[[Page 60704]]
may proceed in the same manner and with the same effect
as if these amendments had not been prescribed.
(Presidential Sig.)B
THE WHITE HOUSE,
October 14, 2005.
|
Back to Main Menu